<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jonathan Leger - SEO And Internet Marketing Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonathanleger.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonathanleger.com</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CASE STUDY: Links from unique vs. duplicate content. by Jonathan Leger</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanleger.com/case-study-links-from-unique-vs-duplicate-content/#comment-32124</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Leger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanleger.com/?p=402#comment-32124</guid>
		<description>Whether it will or not is immaterial. You should always treat the content you create as an advertisement for your business. That means high quality paragraph and/or sentence level spinning peppered with good word and phrase level spins so the output is grammatically correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it will or not is immaterial. You should always treat the content you create as an advertisement for your business. That means high quality paragraph and/or sentence level spinning peppered with good word and phrase level spins so the output is grammatically correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CASE STUDY: Links from unique vs. duplicate content. by Frank Daley</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanleger.com/case-study-links-from-unique-vs-duplicate-content/#comment-32121</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Daley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanleger.com/?p=402#comment-32121</guid>
		<description>Jon I am confused. 

This will probably be boring as hell for you and if you’ve already got as good response just send me to it but…

I’m just starting. I think Article Writing is smart and sensible. I think duplicate content is not (for all the usual reasons). 

I have your Article Spinner.. I have not used it or written articles yet b/c I was concentrating on getting my new and first blog up. 

I have only about 20 posts so far (some of which, of course, can be turned into articles).  I am about to start writing articles

My question is, will the  Spinner handle Google’s duplicate problem stance. 

If so, should we do perhaps only 4-5 vacations of an article and submit them to various directories or sites?  Rather than, say 10, 20 or whatever number that people used to do before Google&#039;s recent unhappiness?

And what is your advice re people who are entering as field as an &quot;authority&quot;  or &quot;expert&quot;(as opposed to an affiliate or even a general marketer). 

Is it crazy to undercut your reputation an an &quot;authority&quot; with many varieties of  articles? 

Would that dilute a reputation (not that I have one yet; it’s the principle I’m getting at!) 

Would that appear (to Google) that you are creating these variations only for linking purposes and not to serve the reader?Which would make you seem less an:&quot;authority&quot; than a general marketer?

 Not that there is anything wrong with being a marketer but some people are Marketers and other USE marketing.

Google wants original content. If you publish posts or articles (or whatever) of excellent quality, Google is saying that it will find that material. There is no need to complicate matters by writing  (using spinning or not) variations on the theme.  

(Am I wrong about that?)

For example, if a person writes a solid piece in a newspaper or magazine and people like it and circulate it, everyone is taken to the same original article, not variations.  
Same with a joke or a video.
 
Is Google not saying it will do the same thing on the Internet?  That it will direct people to the original piece to avoid clutter and too similar variations of articles?  In order to better serve the reader?

I can see crafting several variations of an article for specialty site or readerships but beyond that, I’m lost about how to handle this.

I apologize if this question is too basic but I am truly confused. 

I could use some guidance!

Thank you.

Frank Daley

PS I&#039;m aware, of course, that you sell a spinning program! I&#039;m just trying to determine the best way to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon I am confused. </p>
<p>This will probably be boring as hell for you and if you’ve already got as good response just send me to it but…</p>
<p>I’m just starting. I think Article Writing is smart and sensible. I think duplicate content is not (for all the usual reasons). </p>
<p>I have your Article Spinner.. I have not used it or written articles yet b/c I was concentrating on getting my new and first blog up. </p>
<p>I have only about 20 posts so far (some of which, of course, can be turned into articles).  I am about to start writing articles</p>
<p>My question is, will the  Spinner handle Google’s duplicate problem stance. </p>
<p>If so, should we do perhaps only 4-5 vacations of an article and submit them to various directories or sites?  Rather than, say 10, 20 or whatever number that people used to do before Google&#8217;s recent unhappiness?</p>
<p>And what is your advice re people who are entering as field as an &#8220;authority&#8221;  or &#8220;expert&#8221;(as opposed to an affiliate or even a general marketer). </p>
<p>Is it crazy to undercut your reputation an an &#8220;authority&#8221; with many varieties of  articles? </p>
<p>Would that dilute a reputation (not that I have one yet; it’s the principle I’m getting at!) </p>
<p>Would that appear (to Google) that you are creating these variations only for linking purposes and not to serve the reader?Which would make you seem less an:&#8221;authority&#8221; than a general marketer?</p>
<p> Not that there is anything wrong with being a marketer but some people are Marketers and other USE marketing.</p>
<p>Google wants original content. If you publish posts or articles (or whatever) of excellent quality, Google is saying that it will find that material. There is no need to complicate matters by writing  (using spinning or not) variations on the theme.  </p>
<p>(Am I wrong about that?)</p>
<p>For example, if a person writes a solid piece in a newspaper or magazine and people like it and circulate it, everyone is taken to the same original article, not variations.<br />
Same with a joke or a video.</p>
<p>Is Google not saying it will do the same thing on the Internet?  That it will direct people to the original piece to avoid clutter and too similar variations of articles?  In order to better serve the reader?</p>
<p>I can see crafting several variations of an article for specialty site or readerships but beyond that, I’m lost about how to handle this.</p>
<p>I apologize if this question is too basic but I am truly confused. </p>
<p>I could use some guidance!</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>Frank Daley</p>
<p>PS I&#8217;m aware, of course, that you sell a spinning program! I&#8217;m just trying to determine the best way to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CASE STUDY: Links from unique vs. duplicate content. by Roger Langford</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanleger.com/case-study-links-from-unique-vs-duplicate-content/#comment-32120</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Langford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanleger.com/?p=402#comment-32120</guid>
		<description>While I agree that linking from unique content is more likely to get your site on the first page of Google. Is it important that each unique article, if spun, is grammatically correct. Many spun articles are unreadable, they simple make no sense. Which is why I do not use them very often. Any one reading such an article would definitely not click through to your site. So what I am asking is. Will linking from unreadable junk unique content still rank your site high with Google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that linking from unique content is more likely to get your site on the first page of Google. Is it important that each unique article, if spun, is grammatically correct. Many spun articles are unreadable, they simple make no sense. Which is why I do not use them very often. Any one reading such an article would definitely not click through to your site. So what I am asking is. Will linking from unreadable junk unique content still rank your site high with Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CASE STUDY: Links from unique vs. duplicate content. by Jonathan Leger</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanleger.com/case-study-links-from-unique-vs-duplicate-content/#comment-32119</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Leger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanleger.com/?p=402#comment-32119</guid>
		<description>It can take 3-5 days at the outside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can take 3-5 days at the outside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CASE STUDY: Links from unique vs. duplicate content. by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanleger.com/case-study-links-from-unique-vs-duplicate-content/#comment-32118</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanleger.com/?p=402#comment-32118</guid>
		<description>I love when you do these experiments and prove or disprove a theory.  You make them easy to follow and with out a doubt you provide the correct answer, no matter which way it turns out.  They are great, thanks for the information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love when you do these experiments and prove or disprove a theory.  You make them easy to follow and with out a doubt you provide the correct answer, no matter which way it turns out.  They are great, thanks for the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CASE STUDY: Links from unique vs. duplicate content. by Suzuki Ertiga</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanleger.com/case-study-links-from-unique-vs-duplicate-content/#comment-32117</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzuki Ertiga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanleger.com/?p=402#comment-32117</guid>
		<description>Hi Jonathan, Thanks for your post anyway. I have subscribe to backlinksindexer.com, but how many days it will help to indexing the link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jonathan, Thanks for your post anyway. I have subscribe to backlinksindexer.com, but how many days it will help to indexing the link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CASE STUDY: Links from unique vs. duplicate content. by Alexander R. B</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanleger.com/case-study-links-from-unique-vs-duplicate-content/#comment-32116</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander R. B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanleger.com/?p=402#comment-32116</guid>
		<description>I actually never thought about it. But is make sence in my opinion that i site with unique contens is better in the searchengine machin.

Sorry if you dont get me, Enligsh is not my main language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually never thought about it. But is make sence in my opinion that i site with unique contens is better in the searchengine machin.</p>
<p>Sorry if you dont get me, Enligsh is not my main language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CASE STUDY: Links from unique vs. duplicate content. by Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanleger.com/case-study-links-from-unique-vs-duplicate-content/#comment-32115</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanleger.com/?p=402#comment-32115</guid>
		<description>Another great article Jonathan. I think your case study puts the old unique vs. duplicate content debate to rest.

One of the things I really like about your blog is that not only do you post really good information but you also get some really great comments that also offer good information. I didn&#039;t know about the content protector plugins before reading this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great article Jonathan. I think your case study puts the old unique vs. duplicate content debate to rest.</p>
<p>One of the things I really like about your blog is that not only do you post really good information but you also get some really great comments that also offer good information. I didn&#8217;t know about the content protector plugins before reading this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CASE STUDY: Links from unique vs. duplicate content. by Marik</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanleger.com/case-study-links-from-unique-vs-duplicate-content/#comment-32114</link>
		<dc:creator>Marik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanleger.com/?p=402#comment-32114</guid>
		<description>HI Jonathan,

Another great and valuable post. I like the case study and believe that unique content will always be the way to go. Having Article builder makes it all that much easy for me. Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Jonathan,</p>
<p>Another great and valuable post. I like the case study and believe that unique content will always be the way to go. Having Article builder makes it all that much easy for me. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CASE STUDY: Links from unique vs. duplicate content. by microinjerto de cabello</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanleger.com/case-study-links-from-unique-vs-duplicate-content/#comment-32110</link>
		<dc:creator>microinjerto de cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanleger.com/?p=402#comment-32110</guid>
		<description>hi jonathan. im chilean and a few months ago I&#039;m participating Internet positioning several keywords with your advice, I would like to know when you have a version in Spanish of article builder, am very interested in this program</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi jonathan. im chilean and a few months ago I&#8217;m participating Internet positioning several keywords with your advice, I would like to know when you have a version in Spanish of article builder, am very interested in this program</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

